4 ms·
"For teams of all sizes" is pretty deceptive. Even if the limit was disclosed somewhere deeper, advertising with a fundamentally inaccurate line is unfortunate.
by Bartweiss 10y ago
"For teams of all sizes" is pretty deceptive. Even if the limit was disclosed somewhere deeper, advertising with a fundamentally inaccurate line is unfortunate.
- arcticfox 10y agoWhile their language was poorly chosen, I think what Slack meant was that their free tier was under no additional restrictions than their paid tier for team size, which seems reasonable. And signing people up with an undocumented API that skips a big amount of signup friction seems like a recipe for running into undocumented limits. Would we be upset with Slack for not supporting 1 million user teams? 1 billion? 1 trillion?
- lawpoop 10y ago640k should be enough for anybody
- zellyn 10y agoAt a "team" size of 5000, the 10000-message limit means you each get 2 messages before things start disappearing. So I think the message limit pretty strongly implies a team member limit.
- Bartweiss 10y agoBut is the user limit only for the free version? As I read that support email it was simply a limit on the size of Slack teams across the board.