4 ms·
<So if somebody searches for vaccines, how should the anti-vaxxers and pro-vaxxers be ranked? Just because somebody has an opinion, does it deserve to be presen
by losteverything 10y ago
<So if somebody searches for vaccines, how should the anti-vaxxers and pro-vaxxers be ranked? Just because somebody has an opinion, does it deserve to be presented as likely as every other opinion?
Real example. Bextra. Dr prescribed. Immediate loss of strength in legs especially climbing stairs.
Pro sites gave all +++ chat sites gave common experiences.
I want Google to not touch their search. They can put a good housekeeping tag on search results but don't remove them from my world
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- facepalm 10y agoYou mean you would have wanted a search result that talked about the side effect you experienced? Fair enough, but it is not clear that it didn't show up because of Google ranking, or maybe it simply didn't exist? In any case, this seems to be about a real side effect, not an imagined one.
- losteverything 10y agoI suppose I'm ignorant but I assumed search didn't qualify things. Like if it's true or not or somewhere in between. I used Google to see if others had bextra problems. And thankfully a link appeared. Now i hope these reactive changes don't eliminate content. Let my fingers do the clicking (so to speak)
- facepalm 10y agoThere are always some ranking factors at play for ordering the search results.