3 ms·
Not that you are correct about your view on limitations of reductionism - but even if you were the answer is: because the alternative is magic. Thanks but no th
by balfirevic 10y ago
Not that you are correct about your view on limitations of reductionism - but even if you were the answer is: because the alternative is magic. Thanks but no thanks.
- bykovich 10y agoThat's an unconvincing response. The alternatives are not necessarily magic (it's terribly unclear what you mean by "magic" here, but I'm making some reasonable assumptions) -- but if they were, why would that be so terrible? You're certainly free to denounce whatever you want as "magic" -- but that doesn't tell me why it's bad.