I've heard this defence before but it is absolutely wrong form a logical perspective. We aren't forced to perform a biopsy on everything that shows up just beca

I've heard this defence before but it is absolutely wrong form a logical perspective. We aren't forced to perform a biopsy on everything that shows up just because we see it. It seems only logical that occasionally there would be something detected which is unambiguously cancer. The ones that are ambiguous, we could simply monitor without taking action on. If having more information about the state of your health is putting you in danger, then the medical system is broken. It's as simple as that.