4 ms·
I agree. All this does is make me uninterested in reading the article. The 786 words of exposition were unnecessary. Maybe this Reader's Digest format appeals t
by ClassyJacket 10y ago
I agree. All this does is make me uninterested in reading the article. The 786 words of exposition were unnecessary. Maybe this Reader's Digest format appeals to some, but I prefer substance from scientific articles.
- wavefunction 10y agoI have to laugh (in good humor) at your post, as Reader's Digest provided/provides excerpts of longer pieces.
- ClassyJacket 10y agoMy mistake, then, and I suppose with the name that does make sense. I just thought I remembered reading and not really understanding various long articles like this in it in various waiting rooms as a kid. Bad example, but I hope my point still makes sense.