> ... without having to do business with shady characters in the illicit gold-selling industry, such as Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon. It reminds me this:

> ... without having to do business with shady characters in the illicit gold-selling industry, such as Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon. It reminds me this: http://lesswrong.com/lw/gw/politics_is_the_mindkiller/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/gw/politics_is_the_mindkiller/ > In Artificial Intelligence, and particularly in the domain of nonmonotonic reasoning, there's a standard problem: "All Quakers are pacifists. All Republicans are not pacifists. Nixon is a Quaker and a Republican. Is Nixon a pacifist?" > What on Earth was the point of choosing this as an example? To rouse the political emotions of the readers and distract them from the main question? To make Republicans feel unwelcome in courses on Artificial Intelligence and discourage them from entering the field?