Obviously I have no understanding what actually transpired, but I was reading through the thread, and it seemed like bad the sentiment was more around the behav

Obviously I have no understanding what actually transpired, but I was reading through the thread, and it seemed like bad the sentiment was more around the behavior than the religious nature of the stuff (which definitely also faced some opposition, but less). Sounds like this person just decided to set up shop without respecting other people's use of the same space, and with no efforts towards being non-disruptive. And then when people intervened and had conversations multiple times, they still refused to be respectful. So they got kicked out, and subsequently left an angry voicemail that misunderstands the constitution. The fact that this person already had two other temples they could use nearby made it seem even more like proselytizing, which just made it worse. https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2011-July/024220.html https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/20... I think the reaction could have been quite different if the person had asked about using the space and fixed the space back to how it was afterwards, and had not proselytized. Doesn't seem like too much to ask for a free public space.