4 ms·
Poorly written (probably because it was written in a hurry to piggy back on Susan's article). This doesn't contribute anything new to the conversation.
by plaidturtle 10y ago
Poorly written (probably because it was written in a hurry to piggy back on Susan's article). This doesn't contribute anything new to the conversation.
- chipperyman573 10y agoIf you look past the typos the article does bring up a few new points. (BTW, the author said he was ESL, which might explain the typos).
- plaidturtle 10y agoMore than the typos, I was more put off by the structure and sentence flow which made me feel like it was haphazardly put together, but didn't know he is ESL. Thanks for pointing that out. My apology to the author.
- diminoten 10y agoI think your comment is the first in what amounts to a "noise loop", where your comment doesn't add anything substantive to this conversation, and me pointing out that fact also doesn't add value, ad nauseum, forever. There may or may not have been signal in the submission, but there certainly is no signal in what we're doing. Preferably, you'd have never made your original comment. Maybe I shouldn't even make this one. Who knows.
- plaidturtle 10y agoYet here we are.
- watwut 10y agoI found it interesting. The account does not have to contain outrageous horrible war story to be worth to be read. Moreover, if you are trying to make up your mind about a company or place, non exaggerated no big event story about how normal daily affairs are done there should matter. The fact that this story does not contains ridiculous behavior on part of anyone, just some warning flag does not make it pointless.
- kyrre 10y agopls buy my kindle books