I civil cases such as this the standard is "preponderance of evidence" meaning "more likely to be true than not". At this point, considering both the detailed

I civil cases such as this the standard is "preponderance of evidence" meaning "more likely to be true than not". At this point, considering both the detailed description and the public record showing that Emil Michael and others at the very top of Uber like to behave like drunken frat boys, that standard seems easily met to me.