3 ms·
It's easy to believe. The thinking HR probably was expressing that Susan couldn't expect positive reviews just because she had a valid harassment complaint. Y
by justonepost 10y ago
It's easy to believe. The thinking HR probably was expressing that Susan couldn't expect positive reviews just because she had a valid harassment complaint. You have to look at HR as CYA for the company. Looking at it any other way is naive.
- searealist 10y ago> The thinking HR probably was expressing that Susan couldn't expect positive reviews just because she had a valid harassment complaint. That's very different than what the author claimed. But even so, why would HR even go there? It makes no sense.