> If you are born in a 'bad' place (regardless of the reason for it being 'bad' - a violent/poor neighborhood, a city without hope for jobs, a small country-sid

> If you are born in a 'bad' place (regardless of the reason for it being 'bad' - a violent/poor neighborhood, a city without hope for jobs, a small country-side town with no tech industry at all, etc. etc.) - you should be responsible for improving your life/moving to a better city/etc. Most people born in bad places can't get out of them in large part because they're bad, since the effects of that propagate through. Why should the responsibility for a bad place, and subsequently improving it or getting out of it be placed on a person who wasn't the one to make it bad? People who can get out of bad places are the lucky ones.