3 ms·
Right, I simplified a bit there: You would use a replication controller, but it would have "replicas: 1". This way, the pod is rescheduled and the service repoi
by lobster_johnson 10y ago
Right, I simplified a bit there: You would use a replication controller, but it would have "replicas: 1". This way, the pod is rescheduled and the service repointed, and the volume management ensures that the database gets mounted.
- gtirloni 10y agoGot it, thanks!
- smarterclayton 10y agoNote that replicas: 1 does not actually guarantee "at most 1". If you have block storage with locks (AWS/gce/ceph/cinder), then he second replica won't start until the first is gone. If you try to use "replicas: 1" with a shared filesystem you can have 2 pods running against that filesystem at once. StatefulSets guarantees "at most one"
- lobster_johnson 10y agoThat's solved by setting "strategy.type" to "Recreate", isn't it? This will disable rolling deploys. The replication controller wouldn't then attempt to have two pods running at the same time.