I think too much specialization in the name of economic efficiency is harmful as it causes alienation and apathy. If say this lawyer is required by a law firm

I think too much specialization in the name of economic efficiency is harmful as it causes alienation and apathy. If say this lawyer is required by a law firm to work on cases that end up harming the poor and then donates some of their salary to help the poor, is it really net useful? If this lawyer spends an hour volunteering at a soup kitchen, he learns about the process, the people, their circumstances and needs. It may be something that he can then apply to guide his professional work. Or he may spot and improve some legal inefficiencies in the operation of the soup kitchen. Or he may be reminded that he can actually donate his own excess food instead of throwing it out. Generally, I think we need more communication and cooperation across professions and "social classes", not less. The experience, perspective or education one brings to the table may be just the simple thing the others need to improve.