3 ms·
Not necessarily -- we just need the 5% of humans who survive the disaster to be the smart, appropriate-to-advance ones. Evolution is full of times that a speci
by SomeStupidPoint 10y ago
Not necessarily -- we just need the 5% of humans who survive the disaster to be the smart, appropriate-to-advance ones.
Evolution is full of times that a species reached a chokepoint and a subgroup with a trait was selected for. No reason ecological disaster caused by technology couldn't be one of those times, even if unfortunate for most humans.
Heck, global ecological disaster could be viewed as a copy-cat oxygenation event prompted by intelligent psychopaths to make room for their offspring in a crowded field.
tl;dr: Humans are just parodying the great oxygenation event with the great carbonation event.
- daenz 10y agoI see your point, but it makes the assumption that there is a good biological trait to be selected for, and I'm unconvinced that accumulated wealth is a signal of that trait.