5 ms·

I don't get your comment. Assuming we are not talking about public repos here. OP's employer did set up a private github repo where contractors collaborate on b

by dr_win 10y ago

I don't get your comment. Assuming we are not talking about public repos here. OP's employer did set up a private github repo where contractors collaborate on bank's code. This cannot be searched by google. The problem OP has is that the code should not be hosted outside bank's own infrastructure and contractors should not have access before they pass background checks. According to my understanding.

vickfoo 10y ago
it's a public repo https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13679334 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13679334
- ExactoKnight 10y ago
  Let the hunt begin!
  - i336_ 10y ago
    To everyone worried and/or curious, the code is in a private repo. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13680180 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13680180
- viraptor 10y ago
  No. They said it's on the public GitHub, as opposed to private GitHub enterprise installation. Not that the repo itself is public.
  - AussieOdyssey 10y ago
    This is correct. It's a "public github" as in it's on *.github.com with access to all employees of the consulting company regardless of the background check (That's the whole idea of them moving to their github repo)
    - i336_ 10y ago
      I think there's a small misunderstanding here that I'd like to clear up explicitly. Public GitHub repos are viewable by anyone with or without an account. You can view and clone the repo if you know the correct URL. Private GitHub repos are only accessible to those given access. Within the scope of this terminology, my understanding is that this repo is private. I think I'm right based on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682657 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682657 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682501 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682501. Am I right? Within the scope of corporate security, I understand that the code is being moved out of the local intranet onto a non-corporate-managed Web service. However, GitHub manage private repos for some fairly high-level groups (or at least I assume they do), so their data protection policies are clearly very decent. (I at least know that individual floors on the building are keycarded, which is nice. I learned this from a story posted here by a guy who got fired.) So, even though this is an impressive level of stupid, I'm relieved that no leaking can/will happen (particularly for your sake now you've posted this here). OP, please note that several people have reached out to you from top-level comments. If you could add a new comment listing an email address (IANAL but a new gmail one would probably be okay), or even better yet put it in your profile, that would probably result in some nice leads for you.
      - AussieOdyssey 10y ago
        > I understand that the code is being moved out of the local intranet onto a non-corporate-managed Web service Spot on and this is what I meant. By "public github" I meant code on the internet but accessible to anyone in the consulting company. There are multiple modules and they are moved to github,bitbucket and stash. This also means people without background checks or ANYONE in the organization has access to ALL the code of the bank. In the bank ONLY people in specific departments have access to specific code (As is customary for all IT industry) I am not trying to be a whistle-blower and mr goody two shoes. I am very angry that my refusal to upload code to the internet is resulting in non-payment of fees and threats that I will never get a contract in this city. And as an independent contractor I am truly terrified of uploading bank code to the internet; I don't want to end up in jail for stupid reasons.
AussieOdyssey 10y ago
>OP's employer did set up a private github repo where contractors collaborate on bank's code. This is correct. They are not doing anything criminal. They just want to make sure all employees start working from Day 0. However this is illegal and I refused to push my code out of the intranet

by dr_win 10y ago

vickfoo 10y ago

it's a public repo https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13679334 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13679334

ExactoKnight 10y ago
Let the hunt begin!
- i336_ 10y ago
  To everyone worried and/or curious, the code is in a private repo. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13680180 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13680180
viraptor 10y ago
No. They said it's on the public GitHub, as opposed to private GitHub enterprise installation. Not that the repo itself is public.
- AussieOdyssey 10y ago
  This is correct. It's a "public github" as in it's on *.github.com with access to all employees of the consulting company regardless of the background check (That's the whole idea of them moving to their github repo)
  - i336_ 10y ago
    I think there's a small misunderstanding here that I'd like to clear up explicitly. Public GitHub repos are viewable by anyone with or without an account. You can view and clone the repo if you know the correct URL. Private GitHub repos are only accessible to those given access. Within the scope of this terminology, my understanding is that this repo is private. I think I'm right based on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682657 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682657 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682501 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682501. Am I right? Within the scope of corporate security, I understand that the code is being moved out of the local intranet onto a non-corporate-managed Web service. However, GitHub manage private repos for some fairly high-level groups (or at least I assume they do), so their data protection policies are clearly very decent. (I at least know that individual floors on the building are keycarded, which is nice. I learned this from a story posted here by a guy who got fired.) So, even though this is an impressive level of stupid, I'm relieved that no leaking can/will happen (particularly for your sake now you've posted this here). OP, please note that several people have reached out to you from top-level comments. If you could add a new comment listing an email address (IANAL but a new gmail one would probably be okay), or even better yet put it in your profile, that would probably result in some nice leads for you.
    - AussieOdyssey 10y ago
      > I understand that the code is being moved out of the local intranet onto a non-corporate-managed Web service Spot on and this is what I meant. By "public github" I meant code on the internet but accessible to anyone in the consulting company. There are multiple modules and they are moved to github,bitbucket and stash. This also means people without background checks or ANYONE in the organization has access to ALL the code of the bank. In the bank ONLY people in specific departments have access to specific code (As is customary for all IT industry) I am not trying to be a whistle-blower and mr goody two shoes. I am very angry that my refusal to upload code to the internet is resulting in non-payment of fees and threats that I will never get a contract in this city. And as an independent contractor I am truly terrified of uploading bank code to the internet; I don't want to end up in jail for stupid reasons.

AussieOdyssey 10y ago

>OP's employer did set up a private github repo where contractors collaborate on bank's code. This is correct. They are not doing anything criminal. They just want to make sure all employees start working from Day 0. However this is illegal and I refused to push my code out of the intranet