You say that 99% is fully deserved because you know the person or his family personally? How relevant it is you believing that is fully deserved? Are you reall

You say that 99% is fully deserved because you know the person or his family personally? How relevant it is you believing that is fully deserved? Are you really good informed? I remember hearing about Mark Shuttleworth by acid critics in the press of that Rich bastard that spends so much money to for going to space, money that could be spent on feeding kids in Africa... Later I met the person personally and it blew my mind how much I had been lied and manipulated by the press about the person. The same thing happened as I got to met more and more famous people because of my job. There is a clear bias against Trump, because the same thing is different depending of who who does it but if you can not see it you won't be able to see it, because it means you are emotionally attached to the other side, and you need to detach first. For example, democrats believe it is great that men could sodomize other men and I agree with that, because I believe that what someone does private it no one business. But the same newspapers that believe it is so great to have sex with whoever you want become sexual puritans with the private sexual life of Trump. The same happens with massive surveillance for example, it is so great when Obama does it, because you know, he needs it for going against bad people(under democrat definition), but it is terrible when Trump has it. Now the same newspapers that went against Bill Binney and other whistleblowers, now do interview him and consider massive surveillance bad because it is Trump who controls it. When Bill is asked about it, what he says is: It does not matter who has it, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Bill is objective, people are subjective by nature.