What you are saying is erroneous. It is not in agreement with the facts. You can not ignore that the Washington Post specifically said, as the headline: >Ru

What you are saying is erroneous. It is not in agreement with the facts. You can not ignore that the Washington Post specifically said, as the headline: >Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say They published this in their news section. Not their op-eds. ProOrNot was the source this article used to substantiate the central premise of this article that subversive, clandestine Russian Propaganda was spreading into the US. They've since tried to walk away from this claim without admitting to the journalistic garbage that it is.