4 ms·
Especially since AMD's APUs' integrated graphics have stayed superior to Intel's.
by kinghajj 10y ago
Especially since AMD's APUs' integrated graphics have stayed superior to Intel's.
- Const-me 10y agoIs it still true? http://www.hardwarezone.com.sg/feature-integrated-graphics-faceoff-intel-iris-pro-6200-vs-amd-radeon-r7/performance-and-conclusion-4 http://www.hardwarezone.com.sg/feature-integrated-graphics-f...
- lightedman 10y ago>newest Intel iGPU vs two-gen old AMD iGPU, barely keeping pace Yes, it's still true. That should've been plainly obvious.
- Const-me 10y agoBoth are from 2015: https://ark.intel.com/products/88040/Intel-Core-i7-5775C-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz https://ark.intel.com/products/88040/Intel-Core-i7-5775C-Pro... http://cpuboss.com/cpu/AMD-A10-7870K http://cpuboss.com/cpu/AMD-A10-7870K
- onli 10y agoThat Broadwell-cpu is an exception. It is the only series for the desktop where Intel produced capable integrated graphics. Btw, it is also a very strong processor. But it was released immediately before the next cpu generation was released. It got no real marketing, and support for it was abysmal – some to many games just produced a black screen with it. Based on its performance and pricing I'd have liked to recommend it, but given its socket and its support issues that was almost never a good idea. Normally you'd compare the A10-7870K to the integrated HD graphics of a Skylake or Kaby Lake cpu, it beats those easily.
- lightedman 10y agoThe R7 GPU architecture is not from 2015. R7 came from 2013 with the 200-series of AMD GPUs, and was the second generation of GCN.
- Narishma 10y agoNot to mention the few available Intel parts with those GPUs cost an arm and a leg.
- agumonkey 10y agoI think I've seen news about intel negotiating with AMD to integrate their GPU design in place of intel iGPU/IRIS.
- simooooo 10y agoAll those consoles are bound to have some benefit