3 ms·
Hmm true, my language was a bit ambiguous. I meant it was abandoned by Sustrik [1], even if some of the community are doing the best they can manage to keep it
by shabbyrobe 10y ago
Hmm true, my language was a bit ambiguous. I meant it was abandoned by Sustrik [1], even if some of the community are doing the best they can manage to keep it alive.
[1] http://www.freelists.org/post/nanomsg/New-fork-was-Re-Moving-forward
- jey 10y agoThat seems a bit outdated; looks like main nanomsg repo has regular commits from gdamore now[1], so maybe the fork was resolved? 1. https://github.com/nanomsg/nanomsg/commits/master https://github.com/nanomsg/nanomsg/commits/master
- shabbyrobe 10y agoYep it was eventually resolved midway through 2016, D'Amore stepped up, then stepped down, then stepped up again. The link I cited is not a commentary on the current status of nanomsg, it is more to illustrate Sustrik's role in the situation. If, ultimately, this discussion is about Sustrik's IETF proposal, it is important to consider his relationship with previous similar (zmq/nanomsg) or related (libmill/libdill) projects which have borne his name.
- RickHull 10y agoAlso https://github.com/go-mangos/mangos https://github.com/go-mangos/mangos
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]