4 ms·
Another animal without accompanying confirmations through other sensory channels, so they are confused and does not act as in the presence of a real animal. Th
by lngnmn 10y ago
Another animal without accompanying confirmations through other sensory channels, so they are confused and does not act as in the presence of a real animal.
There is no question that they see "themselves". Animals have no such concept since self-awareness (and concepts per se) require abstract reasoning which in turn require a language capacity by corresponding brain machinery, which is not present (not yet evolved).
To be precise, animals do have aggregated representation of a sensory input, which we might call a concept, so they recognize things and other animals, but no abstract concepts detached from perceptions and referentiable by sound-labels or words, which requires specialized brain circuitry.
Nothing to see here.
- ZeroFries 10y agoI can be self-aware without any words in my mind. Self-awareness does not depend on language; if anything it's the other way around. Edit: I also have a vague memory of knowing of my own existence before having the words to express it.
- woodandsteel 10y agoMy guess is that what we call "self-awareness" in humans has several components, and then the question is which of them are or are not found in any other particular species.