2 ms·
NASA provided a live video of the launch prep. Maybe an hour before the launch, the commentator discussed two issues, and said that for both of those issues, th
by manarth 10y ago
NASA provided a live video of the launch prep. Maybe an hour before the launch, the commentator discussed two issues, and said that for both of those issues, they would make a call on it at T-1 minute.
Later on, the video showed SpaceX launch control center, with a group of people huddled together talking - I'm assuming they were discussing the issues.
One of those issues was resolved quite a while before the launch, but not a lot was said about the second issue - the second-stage engine actuator.
The launch was scrubbed at T-00:00:15. In the SpaceX video [1], you hear someone saying "Hold hold hold", followed by "Launch abort is started".
If I were to speculate, I'd suggest that the second-stage anomaly went away, but no-one could explain why. I think the launch was scrubbed, not because someone said "This will go wrong", but because no-one could say "This will go right". Even if Musk did personally scrub the launch, it was for an issue that had been an ongoing discussion for maybe an hour, and that they had already determined would be a (literal) last-minute decision.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1834&v=V5bG37hzwqk https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1834&v=V5bG37hzw...
- cpayne 10y agoThanks for the link. I find the people that work on this stuff fascinating!! To have that much precision (with 15 seconds left, left just stop). I can right-click and deploy some changes to a production server or run a database script that has a massive impact on the data. But to imagine that many movings parts (ie those workers specifically involved in the launch) and to have those parts all working together. A database change has a massive impact to "our data". When a launch goes wrong - really puts into perspective what "massive" really means... Amazing!
- bpd1069 10y agothink... #> shutdown -h now