6 ms·
Frankly video conferencing that doesn't suck would be huge.
by quantumhobbit 10y ago
Frankly video conferencing that doesn't suck would be huge.
- cdiamand 10y agoAgreed!
- bshimmin 10y agoYes! It feels like I try a new video conferencing system every week, never to see any improvement. I currently pay something like £20 per month for WebEx because it's marginally better than Skype (particularly with more than three people, at which point in my experience Skype becomes unusable). I tried a new one last week (for an introductory call with a new client) - Zoom.us - and it was absolutely agonising: I had to install some junky software on my Mac only to end up with a laggy video connection with appalling sound quality. In the end I made an international phone call to the guy and we both breathed a sigh of relief because we could actually relax and have a conversation. This is not how things should be in 2017.
- GFischer 10y agoApple is the worst offender by being the only major vendor not to support WebRTC natively (and I guess that's why Zoom.us went with their own non-native solution). I know people prefer Macs, but they're enabling this behavior by Apple :( (although they do seem to be working on this - https://sixcolors.com/link/2017/01/safari-to-gain-real-time-communication-features/ https://sixcolors.com/link/2017/01/safari-to-gain-real-time-... )
- metaobject 10y agoWe use google hangouts as our video conferencing tool. It's ok, nothing great I suppose. But I'm now wondering: * what features would make these tools great? shitty? * are we using a subpar vtc tool bc we don't know any better?
- cylinder 10y agoThis is how video conferencing should work: I go to your page and generate a link. I send that link to participants. They open it, the video conference starts full-screen immediately. High resolution, no plugin downloads, no prompts, no "invites," nothing. No clutter on the screen at all. I don't need emojis or filters. If there are 4 participants, split the screen automatically into quadrants with each participant's video in one quadrant. None of that Hangouts auto-switching nonsense.
- danwakefield 10y agohttps://talky.io/ https://talky.io/ ?
- GFischer 10y agoHave you tried appear.in ? https://appear.in/ https://appear.in/ . It generates a link, and has pretty good resolution and no invites or anything, and I like their UI a lot. Most of the other problems (high resolution and immediacy) are a function of bandwidth and internet quality more than anything else I think :( I'm also working on a video conferencing software (for a different use case) and unfortunately we can't do away with the prompts because of security, but WebRTC (https://webrtc.org/ https://webrtc.org/) has done away with plugin downloads for everything but iOS (Apple, as usual, not inviting others into their walled garden).
- wtvanhest 10y agoBluejeans is extremely good.
- bshimmin 10y agoI've never heard of this one. I'd try it, but the pricing page just says "Get a quote" all over it, which is a massive turn-off.
- wtvanhest 10y agoYeah, we used them at LinkedIn, they are definitely enterprise, but are also the best. I have no idea of the price and im sure linkedin is going to skype now.
- mrep 10y agoWe use biba, which is most likely used for amazon chime now (amazon bought biba) and I have never once had any problems with it. It just works
- spollo 10y agoFWIW I've found appear.in through slack pretty nice. Nothing to install. Just type /appear <room-name> and it boots up a room in a browser for you.
- piyushmakhija 10y agoYou might want to check out https://chime.aws/ https://chime.aws/