2 ms·

The hacker news unwritten rule for humor seems to be: Laugh at something you can find anywhere else ---> flag Laugh at something that makes you think, too

by edw519 16y ago

The hacker news unwritten rule for humor seems to be: Laugh at something you can find anywhere else ---> flag Laugh at something that makes you think, too ---> upvote I love a good joke as much as the next guy, but I really love "hacker humor", something that makes you think, too. Something that non-hackers may not even understand, not because it's an inside joke, but because they haven't bothered to raise their level of thinking to "get it". About once a day, I read something here that really makes me laugh out loud. Usually something very clever coming in from left field. Something I would never find anywhere else. I have often typed "humorous" responses myself, but I usually think better and just close my browser before submitting. Then again, I often just let 'er rip. You got me to thinking so I went to searchyc.com and listed my comments sorted by descending points, looking for "humorous" responses that did get upvoted. Here are a few examples of what others seem to have appreciated: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1025798 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1025798 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=926644 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=926644 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1086527 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1086527 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=202154 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=202154 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=829338 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=829338

DanielBMarkham 16y ago
Thanks Ed. This is great feedback. On topic, with practical advice that can be followed. I find that I edit myself with humor much more than other things, especially on HN. Interestingly enough, this seems to have carried over to real life, with not such good results. Sometimes you just need to be yourself. There is a principal-agent problem here as well. HN (or any other site) exists for some sort of narrow market segment. I know I came here because I wanted to go to one place to search and discuss items of interest to startups. From that idea the site has evolved into "stuff that interests hackers", mainly because there is only so much material you can mine using the narrower niche. However, and this is interesting in terms of growth-for-content-sites, the reason I stayed wasn't because the topic area widened up, it was because then it became a place to hang out with other hackers in the startup community, which I _also_ found useful. But once it became a place to hang out, my goals and the site's goals diverged. The site's goals is still to provide some kind of content niche that it does well. That, after all, is what makes it useful. My goals, however, are more like the goals anyone would have in a community: camaraderie, humor, exploration of common ideas and problems, understanding of motivations, discussion of mores. There's not a lot of room between those two goals, but there is some, and I wonder if over time the effects add up. (I don't know the answer. I was just wondering)

by edw519 16y ago

DanielBMarkham 16y ago

Thanks Ed. This is great feedback. On topic, with practical advice that can be followed. I find that I edit myself with humor much more than other things, especially on HN. Interestingly enough, this seems to have carried over to real life, with not such good results. Sometimes you just need to be yourself. There is a principal-agent problem here as well. HN (or any other site) exists for some sort of narrow market segment. I know I came here because I wanted to go to one place to search and discuss items of interest to startups. From that idea the site has evolved into "stuff that interests hackers", mainly because there is only so much material you can mine using the narrower niche. However, and this is interesting in terms of growth-for-content-sites, the reason I stayed wasn't because the topic area widened up, it was because then it became a place to hang out with other hackers in the startup community, which I _also_ found useful. But once it became a place to hang out, my goals and the site's goals diverged. The site's goals is still to provide some kind of content niche that it does well. That, after all, is what makes it useful. My goals, however, are more like the goals anyone would have in a community: camaraderie, humor, exploration of common ideas and problems, understanding of motivations, discussion of mores. There's not a lot of room between those two goals, but there is some, and I wonder if over time the effects add up. (I don't know the answer. I was just wondering)