5 ms·
You might be thinking of "Guns, Germs, and Steel"
by fbonetti 10y ago
You might be thinking of "Guns, Germs, and Steel"
- ptaipale 10y agoThat would be it (by Jared Diamond). An interesting followup from another angle is "Why nations fail" by Acemoglu and Robinson.
- UncleMeat 10y agoNote that GGS is not actually held in high regard by academic historians. Its pop history.
- woodandsteel 10y agoThat's really not true. Do you have any specific arguments against it? Is it your view, for instance, that non-euasian continents could have achieved the power of eurasia, in spite of their lack of suitable plants and animals, and if so, what accounts for what actually happened?
- UncleMeat 10y agoThis just comes with close personal association with a whole bunch of history PhDs. I myself am not an expert on the topic, but they talk about this book the way that psychologists talk about Gladwell. If you want an example of respected history that follows this sort of geographic history model you should read Braudel.