> In the long-term disruptions and changes in jobs are part of the changes in the world. By the way, that's a terrible argument. You may as well call it the n

> In the long-term disruptions and changes in jobs are part of the changes in the world. By the way, that's a terrible argument. You may as well call it the naturalistic fallacy. That it's a natural consequence of progress does not make it good. You ask why... because it's painful to large parts of society, that's why. > Taxing innovation is bad. So is mass unemployment, in fact it's much worse than taxing innovation.