> That doesn't address the question of balance between the seriousness of the illegality and the invasiveness of the investigatory technique. No, it doesn't, b

> That doesn't address the question of balance between the seriousness of the illegality and the invasiveness of the investigatory technique. No, it doesn't, because I addressed the statement, 'What are we gaining? Nothing.' I don't support the policy at all; I think it's a fundamental human right to encrypt data and not have to give the password to anyone.