2 ms·
As far as I can tell, the Opal project does not have a CoC so this is a bad example for "witch hunting based on CoC".
by biafra 10y ago
As far as I can tell, the Opal project does not have a CoC so this is a bad example for "witch hunting based on CoC".
- tokenizerrr 10y agoBecause the Opal project is ran by sensible maintainers. The point of this link is to showcase the kind of people that want CoCs to be a thing. If you read the comments on that issue you will see that the PC warriors are trying to pressure the project into adopting a CoC which would make the behavior that upset them unacceptable. To be clear, the behavior that upset them was a contributor tweeting things on twitter under his private name. They wanted this person to be removed from the open source projects they were working on because of that. The people who are pushing CoCs want to be able to punish people for perceived injustices. These injustices can be tweeting on twitter, and if the PC warriors get their way the punishment is to be ostracized from all open source projects.
- AlexB138 10y agoIf you read the link, you'll see that one of the people conducting the witch-hunt created an issue calling for a CoC. It's a good example of the mentality and its link to CoCs.: "strand referenced this issue on Jun 18, 2015 Closed Create a Code of Conduct #942"