3 ms·
Since the remote already has this built in: no, it wouldn't be cheaper. Less error prone? Sure, occasionally, but it's surprisingly rare. So it'd be a more exp
by IanCal 10y ago
Since the remote already has this built in: no, it wouldn't be cheaper. Less error prone? Sure, occasionally, but it's surprisingly rare.
So it'd be a more expensive, bulkier option which is certainly more uncomfortable to use.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]