2 ms·
That's the rule as it stands. As it's interpreted, small breasts = appears underage for the most part. The issue has been widely reported in the press as eith
by redcap 16y ago
That's the rule as it stands. As it's interpreted, small breasts = appears underage for the most part.
The issue has been widely reported in the press as either a small breast ban or Australian demanding large breasts as indicated upstream.
From http://www.inquisitr.com/59633/australian-government-censor-confirms-small-breast-ban-sort-of/ http://www.inquisitr.com/59633/australian-government-censor-...
"Fiona Patten from the Australian Sex Party (ASP) said she attended a ACB training session late last year where they showed examples of publications that had been Refused Classification due to the size of the woman’s breasts."
As to whether I'm having fun or not, the Australian Labor government has been behaving weirdly when it comes to censorship and personal freedom (net censorship, etc). I guess I'm lucky that I live overseas at the moment, but I do find the moral pandering (www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com) to be over the top.