4 ms·
> But searches incident to a border crossing have always been considered not "unreasonable," because inspecting the flow of things across the border has always
by iak8god 10y ago
> But searches incident to a border crossing have always been considered not "unreasonable," because inspecting the flow of things across the border has always been seen as a legitimate government function.
...
> So searches of digital content are at least outside one of the key purposes of the border search exception.
Yes. And also, who in their right mind would use a phone and an airline ticket to smuggle at most 32GB (or 64, or whatever) of contraband data into a country? Absolutely no one.
- Borealid 10y agoI feel obligated to point out that: 1. my phone has a 200GB microSD card in it right now 2. 256GB microSD cards are readily available 3. phones with two microSD cards are available 4. I can easily purchase a 4TB hard drive that is roughly the same size as a pack of cards It's not terribly relevant, but you're dramatically underestimating the volume of data that can be reasonably stored by media carried on one's person.
- iak8god 10y ago1,2,3) I kinda forgot they still make phones with SD slots :). OK, so the storage goes up by 10x, but still, there are multitude of more convenient and more secure ways to move that much data around. 4) Encrypt that drive and ship it. Why would anyone up to no good go to the bother of passing through border security with it on their person?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- rsync 10y ago"3. phones with two microSD cards are available" link ? Genuinely curious ...
- ridgeguy 10y agoI'm curious - if one carries a microSD card in one's mouth, will mm-wave or X-ray backscatter airport scanners see it?
- bitwize 10y agoJohnny Mnemonic.