3 ms·
Acela Express is barely faster than the existing trains, because most of the track isn't high-speed capable. And I certainly wouldn't mind 1 hour service betwee
by ericd 10y ago
Acela Express is barely faster than the existing trains, because most of the track isn't high-speed capable. And I certainly wouldn't mind 1 hour service between northeastern cities... NYC to Boston is a bit shorter than the TGV main high speed trunk in France (Paris-Lyon, 300 km vs ~450), and DC to Boston is longer (630 km). Currently, Acela takes 3.5 hours NYC-BOS. TGV best case (300 km/hr) would shave a lot of time off there.
Amtrak is government supported to a very limited extent compared to road traffic. If rail maintenance was paid for by the government, like all road maintenance is, it would be substantially more competitive cost-wise with other forms of travel.
They're not terrible because they're sitting on a monopoly, they're terrible because their budget has been kept at barely life-support levels by congress.
- arprocter 10y ago>Currently, Acela takes 3.5 hours NYC-BOS Which is the same time it takes by car, and only an hour less than it takes by bus, plus the train costs a lot more. Pretty embarrassing situation, IMO.