I agree more studies is always better. It's trickier when something that maybe only benefits a very small % of the population. Did you read my comment explaini

I agree more studies is always better. It's trickier when something that maybe only benefits a very small % of the population. Did you read my comment explaining my experience and what I know about AIT? I'd love to hear your thoughts on that qualitative data. What I'd be curious about is having someone who's experienced with AIT, a practitioner and has deep domain knowledge, to see how they would counteract the information in articles like the one you posted. I also always have questions for professionals/audiologists and organizations that are skeptical of AIT. I wonder if they have a sound (pun intended) explanation for why some people can have a diagnosable imbalance in their hearing, whereas others don't; I explain what I mean by hearing imbalance if you read my longer comment I linked to above. Edit: Added and changed a few things.