5 ms·
You might not like this, but here are my honest thoughts: You seem to be selling yourself as a web designer, but your website is terrible, and so are it's conte
by Bladtman 10y ago
You might not like this, but here are my honest thoughts:
You seem to be selling yourself as a web designer, but your website is terrible, and so are it's contents.
I realise this is subjective, so I won't try and justify my thoughts. Frankly I don't care enough to debate them anyway, so you can take it or leave it, as you please.
Your designs aren't minimalist, they're just minimal; empty, underdone.
And even then your colour palettes are grating.
Not to mention that o23.io, days and skyler look pretty identical.
Maybe the reality is that no-one wants to hire you, because you, or the works you use to advertise yourself, aren't quite as good as you might think.
- grayclhn 10y agoYour last sentence isn't necessary.
- Bladtman 10y agoProbably not, but I did think a conclusion was necessary.
- Bladtman 10y agoI changed it to something slightly less inflammatory.
- sokoloff 10y agoDamn, I can only imagine what it was like before the edit then...
- sdflkd 10y agoThe ego on HN gets me every time. I quite like his designs.
- magic_beans 10y agoHis design is excellent for a developer. But maybe a little TOO minimal for a product designer.
- Bladtman 10y agoI disagree. Maybe you are right, maybe this isn't the reason he doesn't get interviews, but if someone sent me that portfolio, I would not give the application a second look.
- Bladtman 10y agoGood for you, and good for OP. I'm really not trying to denigrate anyone, but OP is complaining that he doesn't get interviews. If his reviewers think like I do, using spans correctly in his html, and "playing the game" (which is what others are suggesting) won't do him any good.
- Bladtman 10y agoI should add that this is not meant to discourage you. As always in life, you have three options: 1. Be good. 2. Get good. 3. Get out. I'm not saying you need to take option 3, I'm just saying maye option 1. is out of the question.