2 ms·
Is "sharing" equivalent to "giving for free the hard work to the private industry"? Most of the time the system works as intended. The researchers do their res
by Thimothy 10y ago
Is "sharing" equivalent to "giving for free the hard work to the private industry"?
Most of the time the system works as intended. The researchers do their research on public money, most of what they do becomes public knowledge through papers, if something noteworthy is found, it's patented and licensed and the university gets its cut. The system kind of fails sometimes at giving the researchers (in plural, not just the tenured rockstar) its due, but many times are the scientists the ones that open an enterprise to work it out.
In this case, it's not that system that has failed, it's that different universities are fighting over who has the right to license it. I have no horse in this race, but this it's probably going to become even more common, as improvements on existing technology become smaller and it's harder to tell who deserves the full credit.
- Retric 10y agoThis is 100% paid work, nobody is working for 'free'. MIT is well known for the second form of patient troll where you look for years of very promising research done by someone else, make minimal change using government funds, and then get to lock things up for 20 years. Worse there is now a huge incentive to find some other trivial change to get around this patent thus costing the field 100's of times more than their initial 'effort'.