3 ms·
I mean, there was a nice 15 or so year period between the "new" post-Minsky-and-Papert Perceptron book connectionism and the current "new new" connectionism whe
by curuinor 10y ago
I mean, there was a nice 15 or so year period between the "new" post-Minsky-and-Papert Perceptron book connectionism and the current "new new" connectionism where neural nets were a definite backwater. Most of the PIs doing neural nets dealt with it by being sad but Schmidhuber seems to have dealt with it by doubling down on the weirdness.
- latently 10y agoJust because it wasn't wildly popular doesn't mean there was a gap of any sorts. I agree with Schmidhuber. http://grey.colorado.edu/emergent http://grey.colorado.edu/emergent