5 ms·
From the entry on opera.com: "The x264 developer's analysis is certainly interesting, but I don't think it is the final word on "WebM vs. H.264". Not only is W
by hackermom 16y ago
From the entry on opera.com:
"The x264 developer's analysis is certainly interesting, but I don't think it is the final word on "WebM vs. H.264". Not only is WebM doing well compared to the H.264 baseline profile, which is what's relevant to HTML5 video, but I think WebM will continue to improve both quality-wise and performance-wise."
From the x264 developer's article:
"Update: it seems that Google is not open to changing the spec: it is apparently “final”, complete with all its flaws."
Mhm.
- wmf 16y agoIt is possible to make improvements without changing the spec.
- hackermom 16y agoYes, within limits. And, you can of course just increase bitrate, which still doesn't really solve anything.
- orblivion 16y agoThat update was there yesterday. I think that might be the "claims to the contrary" that this post is referring to.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- famrey 16y agoThe opera.com entry addresses that update. Look at the WebM FAQ: They have a separate branch for possible improvements for inclusion on the main branch.