3 ms·
And yet, when Joel made the decision to shaft the Stack Exchange 1.0 testers, they didn't get anything close to an apology. What they got instead was a pitch ab
by kpanghmc 16y ago
And yet, when Joel made the decision to shaft the Stack Exchange 1.0 testers, they didn't get anything close to an apology. What they got instead was a pitch about why they should be happy to give up their business model.
- hga 16y agoI also don't recall ever getting an apology for his capping CityDesk without any recourse, open sourcing of the software, whatever. I suppose in both cases the distinction is that Joel decided not to apologize. The original point was about how he does that when he actually does it. And all or nothing is a legit thing to do here.
- DenisM 16y ago> he original point was about how he does that when he actually does it. And all or nothing is a legit thing to do here. yes, that's what I meant.