4 ms·
Downloading a lot of music over the cellular data network is a bit scary to me. Is it really wise? That's a lot of bandwidth being devoted to a task that can be
by jsz0 16y ago
Downloading a lot of music over the cellular data network is a bit scary to me. Is it really wise? That's a lot of bandwidth being devoted to a task that can be accomplished faster and more efficiently by just plugging in a USB cable. Phones are personal devices -- it's not like they're too far out of reach at any given time. It would probably be more responsible for this feature to only work over wifi at least until the US data networks catch-up with current demand. I don't want to suffer with slow speeds because someone has their SmartPhone 6 inches from their computer doing OTA downloads of 80MB albums instead of plugging in a cable. I suspect some carriers will disable this feature on their devices. The OTA/web app downloading on the other hand makes perfect sense. Fairly small apps -- stuff you'd be downloading on your phone anyway.
- swernli 16y agoMy guess is that much of the syncing and streaming will require the devices to be on the same local subnet/wifi. Otherwise things get hairy, as you pointed out.
- zmmmmm 16y agoA lot of apps allow you to enable different behavior based on what kind of connection you have. I'd be very surprised if this didn't also.
- dalore 16y agoPeople were downloading audio cd's at 33.6k and slower.
- barredo 16y agoThere was not other option of downloading at that time.
- michaelbuckbee 16y agoA few things to consider: - Most music purchases are individual songs. - Lots of people are streaming music to their phones all the time anyway (Pandora, etc) - There is a class of users that _only_ uses their phone and doesn't have a computer. I guess my point isn't that I don't think US data networks can catch up. Each increase in speed will increase the utility of the network and increase the utilization until we "top out" at phones, iPads and all sorts of devices constantly being connected.
- fierarul 16y agoThis seems very conservative. Let's not worry about the poor US carriers getting so much business these days. In the EU I have an unlimited 3G subscription for about 10 eur. It's probably capped in some way but always got the job done (albeit sometimes very slowly). Why should I worry that the data network is overloaded when the carrier here sells this thing. It's probably illegal to sell a service you know you cannot provide.
- barredo 16y ago> In the EU I have an unlimited 3G subscription for about 10 eur. Where? I'm also in EU and I only get "unlimited 3.6Mbps 3G" for 21€/mo, but after the first gigabyte it get's downgraded to 64kbps...
- dagw 16y agoIn Sweden you can get unlimited 3G for 7€/month if you're willing to accept that they cap you to 64kb/s after 500MB.
- borism 16y agoI just subscribed to unlimited 3G capped at 256kbps for ~6EUR/month on Tele2 Estonia. 256kbps is awfully slow if you are usually on 12mbps home adsl though :)
- notauser 16y agoIn the UK I have a 'unlimited' (10G cap, tethering allowed) for £6/mo with T-mobile. It's good enough that I used it as my only Internet connection for six months. No problems with iPlayer/streaming video, the speed stays at 200kb/sec even after you go over the cap. Just don't do that too many months in a row!
- buster 16y agoEverywhere where i have a desktop computer, i also have Wifi. My mobile would download over Wifi, without having to carry around a cable just for the chance to get some files on the device. Also, 3G downloadspeed has always been around 200kB/s for me.. that's fine for the times i have no wifi.
- louislouis 16y agoGetting things in place for 4G and more.