3 ms·

I highly doubt it. If he had said "10% annual turnover for all people" that would be a really decent signal. He had to add in "that passed probation" so it is

I highly doubt it. If he had said "10% annual turnover for all people" that would be a really decent signal. He had to add in "that passed probation" so it is probably a horrific culture. Just putting that disclaimer raises huge red flags

flukus 10y ago
I agree. Did they get rid of a lot of people on probation? They're standards may not be realistic and joining would be a big risk. Are a lot of people quitting before the base probation? That's a pretty big indication to run.
- passiveincomelg 10y ago
  Maybe that's just their approach to hiring? Everybody says it's broken and hard and whatnot. Maybe they just don't bother much with programming puzzles and "What's your biggest weakness?" questions. If both sides are aware of this approach from the start, it could be fine, no? Or maybe I just lack empathy for this situation because I have never been fired.
  - wtvanhest 10y ago
    That is a really nasty process for the people they hire though. It would not be fine.
  - flukus 10y ago
    If both sides are aware, sure. I suspect that they would begin hiding this information though as it would prevent a lot of potential hires from people already in stable jobs.