4 ms·
You didn't read the link, did you. I say that because one of its topics is promoting contraception. Or perhaps you did read the link, and decided to pretend t
by woodandsteel 10y ago
You didn't read the link, did you.
I say that because one of its topics is promoting contraception.
Or perhaps you did read the link, and decided to pretend that it hadn't talked about contraception.
- chappi42 10y agoOf course I did. I'm just not sure if the link 'child_mortality->lower_birthrate|ending_poverty' and/or 'Africa|Some_Arabic_country->getting_richer->lower_birthrate' will work strong enough and come soon enough if at all. Some of this I heard since the 80ties. Currently I think it's more a cultural, religious and bad governance thing. And unfortunately I see 'no market incentives' which could fix that. Why are e.g. oil-rich countries like Nigeria and Irak not able to provide good life for a large middle class of citiziens? What could be done? (I have no idea - what I see though is that China improved living conditions for hundreds of millions of citizens, it's likely singular but maybe some things could be learned?) For me not the 122 Mio children saved should be at the top but - what they also do - tackle the 'too many Homo sapiens' issue.