3 ms·
Thanks, most of the code for V1 and V2 should be online by the end of the week. Two of the repos use applied math libraries that cannot be open-sourced. For one
by philip1209 10y ago
Thanks, most of the code for V1 and V2 should be online by the end of the week. Two of the repos use applied math libraries that cannot be open-sourced. For one, I think I can drop in an open-source alternative. The other I may not be able to open source.
I'll also be publishing our YCF application and our pitch decks in the coming days.
- heinrichf 10y agoMay I ask what these libraries are ?
- philip1209 10y agoGurobi. The pre-V1 algorithms used the Julia JuMP package [1], which allows swapping of the backend solver easily. I don't think some of the functional tests would pass on the open source solver though (precutting and heuristics in gurobi caused a huge speed gain). The later iteration of the algorithm used the Gurobi python library directly, which is closed source. [1] https://blog.staffjoy.com/retro-on-the-julia-programming-language-7655121ea341#.l3t8azsbz https://blog.staffjoy.com/retro-on-the-julia-programming-lan...
- sandGorgon 10y agowould love to see the solver application (if you are planning to swap an open source solver for gurobi). These class of problems are something I have wondered about, but never truly tried ny hand at.
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoIs it possible for the library simply be removed, and the code posted with the notice that they won't work without either the proprietary library or some code work to swap it out? I like to believe all open source code has value to someone, even if it's someone stumbling through working with said proprietary library, and trying to find something else that connects to it. ;)