My kid said that too. I bought him a mirrorless camera, pretty decent one, about $2K with a 18-55 (18-50?) and an 18-200. He used it for a while and then then

My kid said that too. I bought him a mirrorless camera, pretty decent one, about $2K with a 18-55 (18-50?) and an 18-200. He used it for a while and then then stopped, he uses a full frame Canon body (5DIII) instead. I really really don't get the appeal of mirrorless. Yeah, it's smaller if you are out in bright daylight and you have an f5.6 lens. Not so much if you have a f1.4, 1.8, 2 lens, those have to be big to let in the light. So you have a big fat lens on a slightly smaller body and you give up an optical viewfinder. I shoot sports. Mirrorless is a joke in bad taste for sports. You are forced to do burst because you can't time your shots and now your workflow sucks because you are deleting 98% of your shots. My keeper rate with a 5DIII or a 1DX is 60-80% if I do my part, which I usually do.