3 ms·
I'm sorry, but I didn't conduct any sort of ideological flame war. I simply stated my stance on the issue that the thread was about. Other commenters took up th
by kakarot 10y ago
I'm sorry, but I didn't conduct any sort of ideological flame war. I simply stated my stance on the issue that the thread was about. Other commenters took up the mantle of twisting my words and forcing me to more clearly explain myself.
I didn't realize "gtfo" was too uncivil for HN. I generally do not use such language here, but...
Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face-to-face conversation. Avoid gratuitous negativity.
I did not break that rule. I was not gratuitous about it and was trying to end an argument.
I understand that you think you know what this site is for, but my original comment was in line with the subject matter and was not flamewar bait.
- cookiecaper 10y ago>I understand that you think you know what this site is for I would say that while probably imperfect, dang's understanding of "what this site is for" is pretty reliable, since it's his job to moderate it. ;)
- kakarot 10y agoAnd while I'm sure he does a fine job, I'm contesting his assessment of my motivations and insinuating that I broke any rule. You really like to drag things out. Why don't you just drop it?