>If a website doesn't have at least minimal functionality, then the website is broken. Curious. This goes completely against the sentiment in all of the discu

>If a website doesn't have at least minimal functionality, then the website is broken. Curious. This goes completely against the sentiment in all of the discussions around modern SPA frameworks and JS libraries I've seen on this very website. It seems that for most fronted devs today JS is a natural prerequisite for using their product. Progressive enhancement is often sneered at[1] as impractical and unnecessary. This leads me to believe that there are two mostly disjoint groups of people commenting on this issue in different threads. --- [1] - Good example: https://www.viget.com/articles/the-case-against-progressive-enhancements-flimsy-moral-foundation https://www.viget.com/articles/the-case-against-progressive-...