4 ms·
Looks to be very specifically geared towards a certain type of database load. The ratio of CPU, RAM and storage is fixed, and (in my opinion) the offering inclu
by markonen 10y ago
Looks to be very specifically geared towards a certain type of database load. The ratio of CPU, RAM and storage is fixed, and (in my opinion) the offering includes tons of CPU/RAM with relatively paltry storage sizes.
Additionally, no built-in HA / replication options.
That said, this nicely illustrates how nearly any competent setup will run circles around RDS in terms of queries per second.
And yet I still choose RDS…
- matt2000 10y agoAgreed, not being able to scale storage independently of CPU is kind of a deal breaker. Feels like it's just a way to get you up to higher instance types whether you need the CPU or not.