3 ms·
IMO the hope lies in the fact that many vendors do not depend on privacy invasions in their main business model, e.g. Amazon or Panera will sell me roughly the
by ptero 10y ago
IMO the hope lies in the fact that many vendors do not depend on privacy invasions in their main business model, e.g. Amazon or Panera will sell me roughly the same stuff regardless of which photos I was staring at yesterday. Selling my info on the side is a profitable add-on, but not strictly required for their main business. Maybe unnecessary tracking will eventually be competed away (this does require that a much large fraction of users starts caring about privacy).
One could also introduce confusers -- e.g., setup some "light anonymizing portals" that will add / swap / scramble non-critical cookie data. Done right it should be possible to keep almost all of web functionality intact without introducing a security nightmare, but to work well this also needs a viable business model.
- nojvek 10y agoFor a lot of single page applications, javascript makes sense. Less data to load from server on subsequent requests. Your app is a lot richer. Sure you can disable js, but for the majority the Web would be really broken without js. As a culture, tracking is everywhere. Disabling js still logs your up, referrer and a bunch of other things. I do like what uorigin/adblock and other extensions are doing.