5 ms·
I strongly doubt AMD are specifically targeting the desktop/laptop CPU market. * Cloud computing has an absurd market cap.[1] * Ryzen has some features that s
by zamalek 10y ago
I strongly doubt AMD are specifically targeting the desktop/laptop CPU market.
* Cloud computing has an absurd market cap.[1]
* Ryzen has some features that specifically target cloud computing:
* * More PCIe lanes than a Xeon. These are basically useless for desktop/gaming (as SLI doesn't scale beyond 2 cards). This shines for cloud computing because you can fit more GPUs in a blade. There's also ML to consider.
* * Virtualization security features. The chip can automatically encrypt pages, mitigating some of the virtualization attacks that we have seen recently.
* * More compute per watt. Cost is nice to have (which Ryzen has), but cooling is one of the main concerns when selecting chips for high density.
Intel's brand power is a waste of time and money to compete with. Unless AMD can sort something out with Apple (for example), Intel are going to continue dominating the desktop market - irrespective of which chip is actually superior. It's incredibly likely that only enthusiasts would buy a Ryzen - who AMD has catered for with XFR. Essentially, ignoring IGP is likely a strategic decision because it's irrelevant for the markets that AMD can easily attack.
[1]: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2015/06/18/byron-deeter-state-of-the-cloud/#350677d41034 http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2015/06/18/byron-deet...
- floatboth 10y agoSummit Ridge is literally a desktop CPU. The server CPU line, Naples, will come later.
- lightedman 10y ago"SLI doesn't scale beyond 2 cards" Guess you weren't around in the days of Quad VooDoo 2 GPU rigs. They most certainly did scale. nVidia and AMD's implementation? Nope. They screwed the pooch with that one and will never recover until they learn that the older way was indeed better.
- zamalek 10y agoSLI only matters for gaming - which is outside of the scope of my argument. Regardless, it looks like 3Dfx SLI wasn't that great[1] and I did own a Diamond Monster 3D II. [1]: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/diamond-monster-3d-ii,52-4.html http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/diamond-monster-3d-ii,52...
- lightedman 10y agoDiamond made crap hardware. Creative Labs' cards performed much better. And if your dataset or code is GPU-capable, then no, SLI is quite useful here. "Only matters for gaming" Yea, as if there weren't a bunch of other datasets that could utilize matrix acceleration.