4 ms·
I suspect one physical order index-only scans are supported this should be a lot faster.
by einhverfr 10y ago
I suspect one physical order index-only scans are supported this should be a lot faster.
- jeltz 10y agoI do not think anyone is working on this (I cannot recall seeing any discussion on the mailing list at least the last 2-3 years) and this is only true assuming the primary key is significantly narrower than the table, otherwise a sequential scan is the fastest way to implement count(*).