3 ms·
That's an interesting trade. If you entirely ignore the Bitcoin aspect of it, you're just investing claims against a bankrupt Japanese company which is being c
by patio11 10y ago
That's an interesting trade. If you entirely ignore the Bitcoin aspect of it, you're just investing claims against a bankrupt Japanese company which is being competently administered in the ordinary course of a 民事再生。 Currently 100 yen worth of claims looks like it will receive 25 yen worth of satisfaction at a non-deterministic time between one and two years from now. But, but, but: something like 20 of those 25 yen are presently tied up in a non-liquid-but-very-volatile[+] security, so buying bankruptcy claims gets you effective 2:1 leverage on that security. (Handwavy assumptions: you're sure of getting the 5 yen back that is actually presently held in yen and you can borrow yen for approximately 0% in quantity, so essentially you're paying 10 yen for 20 yen worth of exposure to the security.)
[+] Yes, you can sell 1 BTC without meaningful price impact, but you can't sell 200k BTC without meaningful price impact, so it is not liquid by the standards of hedge funds.
- Animats 10y agoThat's just some bottom feeder buying up claims at a discount. There's a small industry which does that.[1] Sometimes the goal is to buy the business at a big discount and do something with the assets. [1] https://www.law360.com/articles/498711/understanding-the-reasons-traders-buy-bankruptcy-claims https://www.law360.com/articles/498711/understanding-the-rea...
- patio11 10y agoThat was my first thought but, crucially, the bankruptcy administrator is not holding a pile of yen. If he were merely holding a pile of yen, this is a pretty boring deal, and you'd be right -- it's a straightforward swap of liquid cash for illiquid cash with an embedded premium for legal risk. But the bankrupt entity holds 200k odd Bitcoins, and that changes things a lot. I wouldn't make this trade even at an 85% discount to face value, because I think there's a significant likelihood that BTC goes to zero, and so would not buy it and especially would not buy it with embedded leverage.
- herendin2 10y agoI assume you mean that you think there's a significant likelihood that BTC goes to zero before the BTC are returned to the creditors, right?
- patio11 10y agoSubtly different: I think there exists a likelihood that BTC goes to zero before the BTC are sold. (BTC will not be returned to creditors directly, I predict with a fairly high degree of confidence. They'll be sold as a block; Kraken might be separately engaged to transfer money to foreign creditors who might take their transfers in BTC.)