That's some out-of-context quoting, right there. Your post's parent's point, in the bit you quoted, is how "Fake news" has become — or is perhaps more accurate

That's some out-of-context quoting, right there. Your post's parent's point, in the bit you quoted, is how "Fake news" has become — or is perhaps more accurately a thing certain people are trying to make into — a way of dismissing news sources you don't like. I don't read any endorsement or disparagement of either source in that post, or even an implication that they're "of a kind", except insofar as some people have painted both with a "fake news" brush, or that "objective" reporting is hard to find, anywhere. Neither of those claims should be particularly controversial.